IN THE NEWS ~ Conservatives praise new Keystone assessment

Duplicates: THE WINNIPEG SUN (FINAL), 14, THE TORONTO SUN (FINAL), 20, THE EDMONTON SUN (FINAL), 20; THE OTTAWA SUN (FINAL), 8, THE CALGARY SUN (FINAL), 26.

OTTAWA - Conservative politicians hailed an interim environmental assessment by the U.S. State Department as a step in the right direction towards seeing the controversial Keystone XL pipeline approved.

Released Friday, the lengthy report concluded that transporting crude oil and bitumen from Alberta to America via the proposed pipeline would be no more harmful to the environment than moving it by other means.

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver - who participated in significant lobbying efforts by Canada - said the relationship between Canada and the U.S. was the most successful in the world and that the pipeline would represent "shared prosperity, energy security and environmental stewardship."

Oliver is one of many Conservatives to tout the economic benefits the pipeline would bring to Canada.

"The Keystone XL pipeline will create tens of thousands of jobs on both sides of the border," he said in a statement. "Canada's continued prosperity will be determined by our ability to diversify markets for our energy products."

But Canada has come under harsh criticism for its environmental record. Recent reiterations by President Barack Obama about his commitment to combat climate change were interpreted by many Canadians to be an indication that Canada's environmental record needed to be improved for Obama to take the pipeline project under serious consideration.

In his statement, Oliver tried to make that point.

"Canada has aligned its goals on greenhouse gas emissions with the United States, committing to a 17% reduction below 2005 levels by 2020."

The pipeline is of tremendous importance to Alberta, and Premier Alison Redford, called the interim report a "step in the right direction."

"Alberta applauds the U.S. administration for the extensive, exacting and comprehensive review of potential environmental impacts of the project," she said in a statement.

Peter Julian, NDP natural resources and energy critic, called Redford's and Oliver's comments spin.

He also said actual benefits of the pipeline would pale in comparison to the picture painted by its supporters.

"Keystone really in an export pipeline for Canadian jobs," he told QMI Agency. "It wouldn't even create many full-time jobs in the States."

Julian said Canada has squandered its resources, having to import oil at world prices to the east coast and exporting it at a discount to the American market.

"Why ship it out when we could have a national energy strategy here that would and reduce our reliance on international markets."

A decision on the project's approval is expected by the year's end.

 

© QMI Agency 2013

Latest posts

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - Liberals must come clean about vetting process

 

NDP Critic for Canadian Heritage Peter Julian issued the following statement:

"It has come to our attention that a consultant for a federally funded anti-racism project has a disturbing track record of spewing hate speech online against Jewish and francophone communities. This is completely unacceptable. We call on the Minister of Heritage to take drastic action and terminate his contract.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - Ragging the puck won't solve systemic problems at Hockey Canada

NDP Heritage Critic Peter Julian issued the following statement: 
 
“Today’s announcement by Hockey Canada is another attempt to delay the important and urgent work to deal with the toxic culture in this organization. While a former Supreme Court Justice is a credible appointment to conduct the review into Hockey Canada, this won’t be the first time the organization undergoes this process.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - NDP asks for ministers to come to the Heritage Committee

NDP critic for Canadian Heritage, Peter Julian, made the following statement: 

“Canadians are horrified by the incidents of sexual assault and by what they’re hearing from Hockey Canada. They are left with many questions about how this toxic culture is allowed to persist in our sports organizations and what the government is actually doing to ensure this doesn’t happen again.

Share this page

Are you ready to take action?

Attend an Event
Constituent Resources

Sign up for updates