1. News & Updates
  2. From Press Progress: Pipeline or rail: a debate without context

From Press Progress: Pipeline or rail: a debate without context

And for good reason.

Close to 275,000 barrels of crude are now shipped by rail every day, criss-crossing through towns and cities. That’s up from almost none five years ago.

The media has been abuzz about the best and safest way to get more tar sands oil to thirsty markets: pipeline or rail?

The Fraser Institute, ever the opportunists, published a report on the matter this month. The right-wing think tank argues that pipelines are demonstrably safer, and that opposition to them (Keystone XL, Northern Gateway and Energy East) promises to expose Canadians to higher risk involving a product that will find its way to market one way or another.

What you won't read in the Fraser Institute's report is what makes shipping oil by rail so dangerous. Lack of regulation, for one, allows the industry to police itself.

But pipelines are prone to devastating spills, too, and there’s good evidence those spills, on balance, are bigger and more damaging than rail.

What a convenient frame for the oil industry and the Fraser Institute. Here's the problem: Canada has no plan to reduce climate pollution, so this rail versus pipeline debate is happening in a vaccum. That needs to change if we're going to have an informed discussion.

But we're still waiting for the government's twice promised emissions regulations for the oil and gas sector, and we know that even with regulations, Canada will fail to meetour modest target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 17 per cent of 2005 levels by 2020.

Too bad Harper's government has been so busy gutting our emissions monitoring capacity.

Photo: shannonpatrick17. Used under a Creative Commons BY 2.0 licence.

Latest posts

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - Liberals must come clean about vetting process

 

NDP Critic for Canadian Heritage Peter Julian issued the following statement:

"It has come to our attention that a consultant for a federally funded anti-racism project has a disturbing track record of spewing hate speech online against Jewish and francophone communities. This is completely unacceptable. We call on the Minister of Heritage to take drastic action and terminate his contract.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - Ragging the puck won't solve systemic problems at Hockey Canada

NDP Heritage Critic Peter Julian issued the following statement: 
 
“Today’s announcement by Hockey Canada is another attempt to delay the important and urgent work to deal with the toxic culture in this organization. While a former Supreme Court Justice is a credible appointment to conduct the review into Hockey Canada, this won’t be the first time the organization undergoes this process.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - NDP asks for ministers to come to the Heritage Committee

NDP critic for Canadian Heritage, Peter Julian, made the following statement: 

“Canadians are horrified by the incidents of sexual assault and by what they’re hearing from Hockey Canada. They are left with many questions about how this toxic culture is allowed to persist in our sports organizations and what the government is actually doing to ensure this doesn’t happen again.

More

Share this post

Are you ready to take action?

Attend an Event
Constituent Resources

Sign up for updates

New Westminster

Email:
Phone: (604) 775-5707
Address:
888 Carnarvon St Unit 110
New Westminster, BC, V3M 0C6

Ottawa

Email:
Phone: (613) 992-4214
Address:
Suite 203, Wellington Building
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
(postage-free)